….. Nothing puts a chilling effect on an economy quite like a dictator flexing their muscles or aggressively and maliciously expanding their powers. In the case of Barry Bicep, since he has no muscles, he is simply expanding his powers by neutering the legislative and judicial branches of government and disfiguring the United States Constitution; as a result, America’s businesses and a vulnerable American workforce suffer the consequences of his damaging and malicious actions. Barack Obama creates victims (and culprits) where none previously existed. Equally damaging, he creates losers from winners and faux winners from level playing field losers; in other words, the social and economic landscape is turned upside-down. How else would Al Sharpton get an invitation to State Dinners? When Lenin cozied up to the Bolsheviks over the Russian Orthodox Church and the peasants in 1921, the levers of power became the switch of genocide. When Obama cozies up to Iran and the Muslim Brotherhood over the Holy Catholic Church and Judeo-Christians in 2014, the levers of power are aligned with a movement to create a worldwide caliphate. In reality, caliphates and genocides go hand in hand when the switch of genocide is left unguarded by the civilized world. Today, the switch is in dangerous hands. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned us; but, we didn’t listen. On the subject of ideology, Bill Clinton and Barry Bolshevik have little in common. Number one, Bill Clinton would rather emulate John Lennon than Vladimir Lenin. Look out Yoko! Number two, Clinton has enough intellect and political savvy to eschew Marxism based on facts, history, and self-interest. Number three, Bill Clinton is a novice in the skill of falsification in relation to Barack Obama’s advanced falsification skills. Slick Willie’s body language betrays him; whereas, B.O.’s body language is well honed from a lifetime of narcissism and proclivity to say up is down, right is wrong, black is white, bad is good, and America is a land of infidels – without being challenged. In the United States, even with a dumbed-down electorate, being a good falsifier is a necessity for candidates who embrace Marxist ideology if they want to achieve success at the ballot box. The exceptions to this rule are Vermont, Massachusetts, Chicago, Cleveland, Detroit, Philadelphia, Memphis, San Francisco, and zip code 28202 in Charlotte; all are locations where fiscal and social insanity is revered. Where Obama’s successes (getting elected and creating turmoil) are largely derived from his status as a world-class falsifier, Clinton’s successes were largely the result of a mixture of persona, intelligence, and his ability to utilize a mixture of partisanship and public sentiment. Bill Clinton’s ideology is need-based and much more benign than Obama’s Marxist-based philosophies. Mr. Clinton could have easily been a conservative and/or a Republican, in my opinion, if it had benefited his political aspirations. In other words, Bill Clinton is smart enough to know that Marxism is detrimental to a society; however, it is beneficial to a political campaign utilizing the widespread appeal for “free stuff.” During Clinton’s tenure in office, it was not unusual to see a page 27 newspaper article regarding allegations of sexual abuse or violence relating to his encounters with Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, or Juanita Broaddrick, and see a page 1 article reporting his being honored at a NOW convention for advancing female issues. Mr. Obama, on the other hand, is only a Democrat because it was his only avenue to winning elections and implementing his divide-and-conquer agenda. It is all about destruction and undermining the country’s economic vitality and national security. Bill Clinton wants to conquer, in my opinion, the next female with whom he comes in contact; Barack Obama wants to conquer (and then remake) a storied society by utilizing class-warfare and a faux War on Women. Bill Clinton hones in on one woman at a time; Barack Obama hones in on women as a demographic group. Without question, one is mad and the other is a cad. When running for election in 2008, Senator Obama touted debt reduction and stated that it was “unpatriotic” for the previous administration to preside over a $10 trillion national debt. Since his election, that debt has escalated to $18 trillion dollars and is on track to exceed $20 trillion by the end of his reign. Moreover, the 44th President of the United States is on schedule to double the national debt accumulated by the previous 43 presidents over a time frame of two hundred and twenty-eight years. This is a man who says one thing for political expediency – and does the exact opposite in policy and actions. All politicians do this from time to time. Barack Hussein Obama does it every time; he rates a zero in the one to ten scale for credibility and truthfulness. No, Mr. President, they are not “freedom fighters.” They are Islamic terrorists. No, Mr. President, criminals and thugs are not the “good guys” and police officers are not the “bad guys.” Perhaps Barack Obama needs a reality czar. It is virtually impossible for a person to make the wrong decision each and every time a decision is made (or a policy enacted) unless it is done with “intent.” Without intent, the law of averages will kick in and provide relief to a decision-maker who is intellectually lacking or lazy. I once saw a video of Obama throwing up brick after brick on an outside basketball goal. The thing that troubled me most is that he strutted off the court like he had just single-handedly defeated the Chicago Bulls. When mixed together, this level of narcissism combined with the stringent adherence to an ideology that has failed repeatedly throughout history (many historians estimate approximately 100 million deaths attributable to Marxism and/or communism) could easily result in societal chaos, a collapsed economy, and/or catastrophic national security related occurrences………
|